Epistemology of Enlightenment Science
Enlightenment or
modern science rests
On
faith-commitments
Which cannot
themselves pass the tests,
The very methods
of science being insufficient.
Two beliefs are
foundational
On the development
of science, the infringement?
That the universe
is rational,
That the universe
is contingent.
Rationality itself
cannot be proven
By the methods
endeared by science.
But it must be an assumed
conclusion
That a faith-commitment is starting point compliant.
If contingency were
not creation’s groan
But an emanation
from an absolute spirit,
Then all would be
totally known
Thus to science,
not sincere it.
Pure
contemplation, if thus so,
And not of scientific
explanation,
Ultimate reality
directly accessed, though,
No need then for laborious,
scientific experimentation.
But if the Spirit
of creation
Were a personal
God, an alliance
Gifting a degree
of autonomy through incarnation,
Then contingency
is foundational to science.
Therefore, let it
be known in our memories
That Enlightenment
science motifs,
In a culture of centuries
Were born and
shaped by these two beliefs.
A versed interpretation and re-presentation by Worth
Earlwood Norman, Jr. of
Lesslie Newbigin, The
Gospel in a Pluralist Society
Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., Grand Rapids, MI 1989,
page 20.